IND

Trending Now

Jawaharlal Nehru

Jawaharlal Nehru viewed Katchatheevu Island as an annoyance,” raises the stakes S Jaishankar as Center

S Jaishankar’s remarks follow Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s criticism of the DMK on Monday about the Katchatheevu Island dispute.

The political controversy surrounding the Katchatheevu problem grew on Monday when S Jaishankar, the minister of external affairs, addressed a press conference and asserted that the long-standing conflict over fishing rights and territory surrounding the island had been discussed frequently in Parliament and had not emerged overnight. In addition, he asserted that Congress prime ministers threw up Indian fishermen’s rights and showed apathy toward Katchatheevu Island, despite opposing legal opinions.

S Jaishankar’s remarks follow Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s criticism of the DMK over the Katchatheevu Island dispute, in which he said the Tamil Nadu ruling party did nothing to protect the interests of the state.

Declaring that the issue has not emerged suddenly but has always been a live matter, Jaishankar said at the press conference that prime ministers like Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi referred to Katchatheevu, which was granted to Sri Lanka in 1974 as part of a maritime boundary agreement, as a “little island” and “little rock.”

“In May 1961, Jawaharlal Nehru, who was the prime minister at the time, wrote, ‘I would not hesitate to relinquish our claim to this small island as I place no significance on it.'” I dislike issues like this being brought up again in parliament and left unresolved. Thus, Pandit Nehru considered this small island to be an annoyance and of no significance. The sooner you deliver it to him, the better, in his opinion.”

“Indira Gandhi also held this opinion,” Jaishankar continued.

“The Katchatheevu issue is a current one that is frequently discussed in Parliament; it did not arise overnight. According to Jaishankar, “the Congress and DMK treated the Katchatheevu issue as though they bore no responsibility.”

According to Jaishankar, there has been a lot of interaction between the central government and the state government. He stated that he has responded to the chief minister on at least 21 occasions.

Criticizing the DMK for its outspoken opposition to the deal, Jaishankar claimed that M Karunanidhi, the party’s leader and former chief minister, had been well briefed of the 1974 agreement between Sri Lanka and India.

He went on to say that the Congress and the DMK had “connived” in large part to create this position in 1974 and beyond.

According to Jaishankar, in the last 20 years, Sri Lanka has arrested 6,184 Indian fishermen and seized 1,175 of their fishing vessels.

He stated, “We have to find a solution. The Narendra Modi government has been working to guarantee that the Indian fishermen are released. The Sri Lankan administration and I need to get together and resolve this,” the EAM stated.

Earlier on Monday, Modi took to X and wrote, “New details emerging on the issue of India handing over the Katchatheevu island to Sri Lanka Lank have unmasked the DMK’s double game.” Modi was citing a news report that claimed M Karunanidhi had given his concurrence to the agreement despite his party, the DMK, publicly posturing against the deal.

The media article is based on an RTI response that Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai obtained in response to his inquiries concerning the 1974 Indo-Lanka pact, which was signed during the tenure of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.

“DMK has done NOTHING to safeguard Tamil Nadu’s interests,” stated Modi, setting aside his rhetoric. The latest information on Katchatheevu has completely exposed the DMK’s hypocritical standards.

“The DMK and the Congress are families. Their sons and daughters’ success is all that matters to them. They have no regard for other people. He continued, “Our impoverished fishermen and fisherwomen in particular have suffered because of their callousness toward Katchatheevu.

Regarding the matter, the prime minister took aim at the Congress on Sunday. of putting in 75 years and counting at work.

Inputs From Hindustan Times!

Also Read : Prices for gold and silver as of today, April 1, 2024: Review the most recent prices in your city.

Review of Ae Watan Mere Watan: Not Always Entertaining, Not Especially Funny

Ae Watan Mere Watan should be approached cautiously because certain Mumbai filmmakers are openly propagandizing using politics and history as platforms. Fortunately, it seems that the historical thriller from Dharmatic Entertainment and Amazon MGM Studios is impartial and devoid of political agendas.
Sara Ali Khan plays a freedom warrior in the movie Ae Watan Mere Watan, which is available to view on Amazon Prime Video. The film avoids going overboard since it tells the story of a little-known but important aspect of India’s freedom struggle.

AE Watan Unlike the liberation warriors in the film who chant slogans, profess their unwavering rejection to colonialism, and demonstrate against a harsh tyranny, Mere Watan is anything but a victim of noisy posturing. Despite exhibiting commendable moderation in fostering patriotism, the film falls short of becoming more than the sum of its parts.

AE Watan Even while Kannan Iyer’s Mere Watan has elements that are instantly appealing, it doesn’t have the same impact in this time when news is experiencing a protracted silly season. Ten years ago, Iyer made her big screen debut in the occult horror movie Ek Thi Dayan.

AE Watan The central theme of Darab Farooqui’s novel Mere Watan is a period in the life of Usha Mehta, an independence warrior. The primary actress, Sara Ali Khan, is just too light and porcelain-like to convey the intense need of the incredibly lusty woman.

In 1942, Usha Mehta, then just twenty-two years old, started a clandestine radio station to teach people about independence. Her pro-Churchill judge father, Sachin Khedekar, felt that the family did not need to support the Congress, thus she defied him by doing this step. She was inspired by the Quit India movement and the “do or die” admonition of Mahatma Gandhi.

The film only touches on a small amount of history. Usha disobeyed for a few months before the authorities cracked down on her and her allies. She spent four years in prison for breaking a World War II radio station prohibition. The small child, however, is unfazed by the prospect of suffering repercussions or her father’s anger.


Gandhi is portrayed by Uday Chandra and appears twice in two sequences. Ae Watan Mere Watan revolves around the socialist leader Ram Manohar Lohia (with a long appearance by Emraan Hashmi). The voice of the latter is often heard over the radios and elsewhere as Usha and her companions, Kaushik (Abhay Verma) and Fahad (Sparsh Shrivastava), run Congress Radio from a secret location and try to avoid the law for as long as they can.

In Hindi movies, Lohia has never gotten enough credit. In the Usha Mehta story, Ae Watan Mere Watan treats him with the dignity he deserves, giving the public access to an important historical document that hasn’t gotten enough attention up to this point. The fun-loving actor Hashmi lends Lohia nuance without going overboard with the dramatics.


Despite the exceptional talent, the movie felt lacking in both substance and pace. Ae Watan Mere Watan is a thriller in the classic sense, complete with chase scenes and action sequences, but it isn’t quite the cloak-and-dagger drama that it could have been. It lacks the innate ability to genuinely evoke a sense of tension or danger.

Radio waves are compared to wings in the film. Mahatma Gandhi therefore advises his followers to “let your wings grow.” Usha aims to attain independence through the radio frequencies she transmits “from somewhere in India,” and she intends to do just that.

Ae watan mere watan

Alex O’Nell portrays Inspector John Lyre of the Mumbai Police, actively seeking the operators of the covert radio station. A short preface reveals parts of the movie’s finale, which revolves around a raid on a structure housing the secret broadcasting equipment.

As a policeman aims a gun, Usha runs down a stairway. The focus shifts to the 10-year-old protagonist as she learns the value of the liberation movement from her instructor at an outdoor school in Surat.

The production emphasizes lines resembling speeches rather than conversational exchanges, resulting in a somewhat stiff presentation. Nonetheless, some points of “Ae Watan Mere Watan” remain valid and merit discussion.

Usha argues that news can empower individuals in one instance, countering a colleague’s dissatisfaction with publications disseminating misleading information. She emphasizes the importance of enlightening the public when misleading information is distributed through official channels.

Later, Usha and her allies discuss the dangers of blind devotion, using Lohia as an example. Although admired by Jawaharlal Nehru, Lohia wasn’t hesitant to challenge him when necessary.

Lohia is mentioned again in the movie to underscore that opposing a monarch doesn’t always imply a desire to overthrow them. One fights against the dictator because they are an oppressor.

“Mere Watan” presents patriotism not as a goal or a universal solution but as transcending the limited scope of its current representation.

With an undercurrent of subversion, “Mere Watan” tackles themes of love, revolution, freedom, unity, truth, and pragmatism, elevating it above a mere chronicle.

JioSaavn.com exclusively offers the latest songs. The accurate manufacturing design ensures historical authenticity, and Amalendu Chaudhary’s color palette adds strong visual appeal.

The film’s ideas are succinctly explained, yet the narration lacks the memorability and engagement expected throughout the compelling plot.

Cast:

Sara Ali Khan, Sachin Khedekar, Abhay Verma, Sparsh Shrivastav, Alexx O’ Nell, Anand Tiwari, Emraan Hashmi

Director:

Kannan Iyer

Originally this article is posted by NDTV

Also check Abraham Ozler OTT release today: Know Where To Stream This Crime Thriller Online!